gal3 (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Gal3, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 63 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gal3/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 63 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Environmental enrichment modulates chronic poststroke inflammation and links white matter TREM2‐positive microglia in recovery in mice"
Article Title: Environmental enrichment modulates chronic poststroke inflammation and links white matter TREM2‐positive microglia in recovery in mice
Journal: Neuroprotection
doi: 10.1002/nep3.70028
Figure Legend Snippet: Infarct size correlations with peri‐infarct immunofluorescence analysis of ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1), galectin‐3 (Gal3), and purinergic receptor P2Y12 (P2RY12). (A) Representative immunostaining of 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI), Iba1, P2RY12, and Gal3 in a standard environment (SE) mouse at peri‐infarct area (at ×20 magnification). (B) Representative immunostaining of DAPI, Iba1, P2RY12, and Gal3 in an enriched environment (EE) mouse at peri‐infarct area (at ×20 magnification). (C) Quantification of indirect infarct area measurements. (D) Correlation of infarct area with Neuroscore per group. (E) Iba1 coverage quantification measured as the percentage of image covered by Iba1 area (%area). (F) Correlation of infarct area with Iba1 coverage. (G) Gal3 coverage quantification measured as the percentage of image covered by Iba1 + Gal3 + area (%area). (H) Correlation of infarct area with Gal3 coverage. (I) P2RY12 coverage quantification measured as the percentage of image covered by Iba1 + P2RY12 + area (%area). (J) Correlation of infarct area with P2RY12 coverage. Peri‐infarct area is shown as dashed red lines in A and B. In (C, E, G, and I), values are expressed as individual experimental replicates with mean ± SEM. In (D, F, H, and J), values are expressed as individual experimental replicates with simple linear regression lines; Pearson correlation's r value with p ‐value are also shown. In (C, E, G, and I), unpaired t ‐test was performed. n = 4/6 mice in SE and n = 7 mice in EE (2 mice in SE were not behaviorally characterized). P ‐values and r values are expressed with 3 decimals. P ‐values were not corrected for multiple comparisons.
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Binding Assay, Immunostaining
Figure Legend Snippet: Infarct size correlations with white matter immunofluorescence analysis of ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1), galectin‐3 (Gal3), and purinergic receptor P2Y12 (P2RY12). (A) Representative immunostaining of 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI), Iba1, P2RY12, and Gal3 (at ×20 magnification) in a standard environment (SE) mouse at white matter area (corpus callosum + external capsule). (B) Representative immunostaining of DAPI, Iba1, P2RY12, and Gal3 in an enriched environment (EE) mouse at white matter area (at ×20 magnification). (C) Iba1 coverage quantification measured as the percentage of image covered by Iba1 area (%area). (D) Gal3 coverage quantification measured as the percentage of image covered by Iba1 + Gal3 + area (%area). (E) P2RY12 coverage quantification measured as the percentage of image covered by Iba1 + P2RY12 + area (%area). (F) Correlation of infarct area with Iba1 coverage. (G) Correlation of infarct area with Gal3 coverage. (H) Correlation of infarct area with P2RY12 coverage. White matter area is shown as dashed red lines in (A, B). In (C–E) values are expressed as individual experimental replicates with mean ± SEM. In (F–H) values are expressed as individual experimental replicates with simple linear regression lines; Pearson correlation's r value with p ‐value are also shown. In (C–E) unpaired t ‐test was performed n = 6 mice in SE and n = 7 mice in EE. p ‐Values and r values are expressed with 3 decimals. p ‐Values were not corrected for multiple comparisons.
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Binding Assay, Immunostaining
Figure Legend Snippet: Quantification of peri‐infarct myelin debris, white matter myelin loss, and their correlations with microglial markers. (A) Representative myelin staining in a standard environment mouse (at ×20 magnification). (B) Enlarged views of infarct contralateral cortical (green square) and peri‐infarct (red square) myelin in a standard environment (SE) mouse. (C) Representative myelin staining in an enriched environment mouse (at ×20 magnification). (D) Enlarged views of infarct contralateral cortical (green square) and peri‐infarct (red square) myelin in an enriched environment (EE) mouse. (E) Myelin debris coverage quantification measured as the percentage of peri‐infarct image covered by Black Gold Myelin dark debris area (%area). (F) Correlation of infarct area with myelin debris coverage. (G) Myelin loss quantification measured as the percentage of myelin lost at corpus callosum in ipsilateral versus contralateral infarct. (H) Correlation of infarct area with myelin loss. (I) Correlations of myelin debris with ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1), galectin‐3 (Gal3), purinergic receptor P2Y12 (P2RY12), cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68), and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) coverages at peri‐infarct. (J) Correlations of myelin loss with Iba1, Gal3, P2RY12, CD68, and TREM2 coverages at white matter. In (E, G) values are expressed as individual experimental replicates with mean ± SEM. In (F, H, I, J), values are expressed as individual experimental replicates with simple linear regression lines; Pearson correlation's r value with p ‐value are also shown. In (E, G) unpaired t‐test was performed. n = 6 mice in SE and n = 7 mice in EE. p ‐Values and r values are expressed with 3 decimals. p ‐Values were not corrected for multiple comparisons.
Techniques Used: Staining, Binding Assay
